Hiatus Irrationalis: Lask’s Fateful Misreading of Fichte

European Journal of Philosophy 30 (3):977-995 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

‘Facticity’ is a concept that classical phenomenologists like Heidegger use to denote the radically contingent or underivably brute conditions of intelligibility. Yet Fichte coins the term, to which he gives the opposing use of denoting unacceptably brute conditions of intelligibility. For him, radical contingency is a problem to be solved by deriving such conditions from reason. Heidegger rejects Fichte's recoil from facticity with his hermeneutics of facticity, supplanting Fichte's metaphor of our always being in reason's hand with the metaphor of our always having been thrown. How does Heidegger inherit and diametrically repurpose Fichte's neologism? Whence the reversed meaning of ‘facticity’ in post-Kantian thought? The answer is Lask's doctoral thesis, which exerts an acknowledged impact on Heidegger's habilitation thesis. Lask interprets ‘facticity’ as Fichte's term for the individuality problem, that is, the resistance of the material particularity of individuals to explanation by the categories genetically deduced from reason. On his interpretation, ‘facticity’ denotes radical contingency in the guise of haecceity, that is, the brute uniqueness of individuals. Lask credits Fichte with registering the problem of individuality, which highlights the world's irreducibly precategorial character. But how is ‘facticity’ transmitted from Lask to Heidegger, given their opposing interpretations of how Fichte understands its meaning? I argue that (1) Lask misreads Fichte as a proponent of facticity, that is, one whose accommodation of radical contingency deflates the Wissenschaftslehre's systematic ambitions, and (2) Lask's misreading, without deceiving Heidegger regarding the sincerity of Fichte's ambitions, encourages Heidegger's own hermeneutics of facticity.

Similar books and articles

Max webers wertfreiheitspostulat und die naturalistische begründung Von normen.Valer Ambrus - 2001 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 32 (2):209-236.
EY OIΔ A and OYΔ E EI∑: cases of Hiatus.A. C. Moorhouse - 1962 - Classical Quarterly 12 (02):239-.
Fichte, lask, and lukács's Hegelian marxism.Tom Rockmore - 1992 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 30 (4):557-577.
Ey Oiδa And Oyδe Ei∑: cases of Hiatus.A. C. Moorhouse - 1962 - Classical Quarterly 12 (3-4):239-247.
Fichtes Idealismus Und Die Geschichte.Emil Lask (ed.) - 1902 - J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).
Ey Oiδa And Oyδe Ei∑: cases of Hiatus.A. C. Moorhouse - 1918 - Classical Quarterly 12 (2):239-247.
Neo-Kantianism as Neo-Fichteanism.Frederick Beiser - 2018 - Fichte-Studien 45:309-327.
Interlinear Hiatus In Trimeters.T. C. W. Stinton - 1977 - Classical Quarterly 27 (01):67-.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-08-25

Downloads
103 (#121,931)

6 months
103 (#7,879)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

G. Anthony Bruno
Royal Holloway University of London

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations