How Theories Became Knowledge: Morgan's Chromosome Theory of Heredity in America and Britain [Book Review]
Journal of the History of Biology 35 (3):471-535 (2002)
T. H. Morgan, A. H. Sturtevant, H. J. Muller and C. B. Bridges published their comprehensive treatise "The Mechanism of Mendelian Heredity" in 1915. By 1920 Morgan 's "Chromosome Theory of Heredity" was generally accepted by geneticists in the United States, and by British geneticists by 1925. By 1930 it had been incorporated into most general biology, botany, and zoology textbooks as established knowledge. In this paper, I examine the reasons why it was accepted as part of a series of comparative studies of theory-acceptance in the sciences. In this context it is of interest to look at the persuasiveness of confirmed novel predictions, a factor often regarded by philosophers of science as the most important way to justify a theory. Here it turns out to play a role in the decision of some geneticists to accept the theory, but is generally less important than the CTH's ability to explain Mendelian inheritance, sex-linked inheritance, non-disjunction, and the connection between linkage groups and the number of chromosome pairs; in other words, to establish a firm connection between genetics and cytology. It is remarkable that geneticists were willing to accept the CTH as applicable to all organisms at a time when it had been confirmed only for Drosophila. The construction of maps showing the location on the chromosomes of genes for specific characters was especially convincing for non-geneticists
|Keywords||chromosomes cytology genetics linkage groups nondisjunction predictions reception of theories T. H. Morgan William Bateson|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
'Your True and Proper Gender': The Barr Body as a Good Enough Science of Sex.Fiona Alice Miller - 2006 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 37 (3):459-483.
Predictivism and the Periodic Table.Stephen G. Brush - 2007 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 38 (1):256-259.
“Enfant Terrible”: Lancelot Hogben’s Life and Work in the 1920s.Steindór J. Erlingsson - forthcoming - Journal of the History of Biology.
‘Your True and Proper Gender’: The Barr Body as a Good Enough Science of Sex.Fiona Alice Miller - 2006 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 37 (3):459-483.
Similar books and articles
Conceptual Tensions Between Theory and Program: The Chromosome Theory and the Mendelian Research Program. [REVIEW]Gerrit Balen - 1987 - Biology and Philosophy 2 (4):435-461.
A Novel Interpretation of Plato's Theory of Forms.P. X. Monaghan - 2010 - Metaphysica 11 (1):63-78.
The Chromosome Theory of Mendelian Inheritance: Explanation and Realism in Theory Construction.Marga Vicedo - 1990 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:179 - 191.
T.H. Morgan, Neither an Epistemological Empiricist nor a “Methodological” Empiricist.Marga Vicedo - 1990 - Biology and Philosophy 5 (3):293-311.
Quantum Chaos and Semiclassical Mechanics.Robert Batterman - 1992 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:50-65.
The Aggressiveness of Playful Arguments.Dale Hample, Bing Han & David Payne - 2010 - Argumentation 24 (4):405-421.
A Transdisciplinary Perspective Concerning the Origin of the Species: The Migratory Theory of Genetic Fitness.D. E. Montoya, D. A. Peck, N. L. Montoya & C. P. Montoya - 2009 - World Futures 65 (3):166 – 175.
Added to index2011-05-29
Total downloads16 ( #295,019 of 2,158,673 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #354,589 of 2,158,673 )
How can I increase my downloads?