Critical Inquiry 16 (2):397-437 (1990)

Authors
Daniel Brudney
University of Chicago
Abstract
When literary texts are included in a course on moral philosophy they tend to be classical tragedies or existentialist novels: texts filled with major moral transgressions and agonized debates over rights, wrongs, and relativism. Recently, however, the focus of much discussion on literature and moral philosophy has been Henry James’s last novel, The Golden Bowl. This ought to seem surprising. For The Golden Bowl is a quintessential Jamesian novel. Almost nothing happens. In the course of more than five hundred pages there are two marriages, one affair, and a single act of violence, the smashing of the golden bowl. The rest is reflection, nuance, detail: the creation and preservation of a “‘brilliant, perfect surface,’” one “scarcely more meant to be breathed upon, it would seem, than the cheek of royalty.”1 There are no extreme actions or high-flown speculations. The moral issues among the four central characters either go unspoken or are raised expressly to be suppressed, banished from articulation. And what counts as the expression of the moral maturity and insight of the heroine, Maggie Verver, is her extraordinary ability to keep the truth silen00to put it precisely, to lie. If even there was a novel in which the protagonists shied away from moral debate, it is The Golden Bowl.The challenge for the philosophical critic, it seems to me, is to argue that it is just this stress on surface and silence that makes this novel of interest to moral philosophers, that makes it exemplary for how literature can do something philosophically important that philosophy cannot. 1. Henry James, The Golden Bowl , pp. 445, 172; hereafter cited by page number. Daniel Brudney is an assistant professor of philosophy at the University of Chicago
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1086/448539
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,784
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Introduction: Narratives in Ethics of Education.Susan Verducci - 2014 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 33 (6):575-585.
On Timothy Findley’s The Wars and Classrooms as Communities of Remembrance.Ann Chinnery - 2014 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 33 (6):587-595.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Philosophy, Interpretation and The Golden Bowl.Peter Jones - 1983 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures 16:211-228.
The Meaning of Silence.Richard Ennals - 2007 - AI and Society 21 (4):625-632.
The Golden Rule: Two Versions and Two Views.Ron B. Rembert - 1983 - Journal of Moral Education 12 (2):100-103.
Levels of Meaning in the Golden Rule.Jeffrey Wattles - 1987 - Journal of Religious Ethics 15 (1):106 - 129.
Silence is Not Always Golden in Medical Decision-Making.John J. Paris & Michael P. Moreland - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (7):39 – 40.
Whether There is the Golden Rule in Aristotle’s Ethics?Ruben Apressyan - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 10:9-15.
Can We Forget to Censor Silence? A Rejoinder to Applebaum.John E. Petrovic - 2003 - Journal of Moral Education 32 (2):163-166.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-01-17

Total views
19 ( #568,979 of 2,463,151 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,363 of 2,463,151 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes