Parthenotes, iPS Cells, and the Product of ANT-OAR

The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 10 (1):123-142 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Dignitas personae teaches that before research into certain alternative techniques for deriving human pluripotent stem cells can be licit, it is necessary to have moral certitude that no human embryo is brought into existence by those techniques. This article evaluates three such techniques—human parthenogenesis, ANT-OAR, and direct cellular reprogramming—and asks whether at present such moral certitude is achievable. National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 10.1 (Spring 2010): 123–142.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Parthenotes and the Parthenon.Russell DiSilvestro - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (3):35-36.
On judging works of visual art.Conrad Fiedler - 1949 - Berkeley,: Univ. of California Press.
Symbolism and Sacredness of Human Parthenotes.Zubin Master & G. K. D. Crozier - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (3):37-39.
Apical cells as meristems.Robert W. Korn - 1993 - Acta Biotheoretica 41 (3):175-189.
On the Status of Parthenotes.Joachim Huarte & Antoine Suarez - 2004 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 4 (4):755-770.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-18

Downloads
32 (#488,786)

6 months
1 (#1,516,429)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references