Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (3):1531-1547 (2020)

Samuel V. Bruton
University of Southern Mississippi
As concern over the use of questionable research practices in academic science has increased over the last couple of decades, some reforms have been implemented and many others have been debated and recommended. While many of these proposals have merit, efforts to improve scientific practices are more likely to succeed when they are responsive to the prevailing views and concerns of scientists themselves. To date, there have been few efforts to solicit wide-ranging input from researchers on the topic of needed reforms. This article is a qualitative report of responses from federally funded scientists to the question of what should be done to address the problem of QRPs in their disciplines. Overall, participants were concerned about how institutional and career-oriented incentives encourage the use of QRPs. Compared to previous recommendations, participants had surprisingly little confidence in the ability of ethics training to improve research integrity.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11948-020-00182-9
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 51,232
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

What Research Institutions Can Do to Foster Research Integrity.Lex Bouter - forthcoming - Science and Engineering Ethics:1-7.
How to Judge Scientific Research Articles.Hennie Lotter - 2000 - South African Journal for Language Teaching 34.
Professionalism in Science: Competence, Autonomy, and Service.Hugh Desmond - 2020 - Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (3):1287-1313.
An Ethics of the System: Talking to Scientists About Research Integrity.Sarah Davies - 2019 - Science and Engineering Ethics 25 (4):1235-1253.


Added to PP index

Total views
5 ( #1,096,974 of 2,330,051 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #151,384 of 2,330,051 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes