China Review International 10 (1):157-164 (2003)

This is a full length review in which I discuss the strengths and weaknesses of Jane Geaney's On the Epistemology of the Senses in Early Chinese Thought. Geaney's strengths lie in her refusal to import Western epistemological presuppositions into depictions of Early Chinese philosophy, her meticulous canvassing of key Warring States texts, and her insightful reconstruction of Early Chinese epistemology as based on perception rather than abstract concepts. Her weaknesses are the limited range of her representative texts and her occasional overgeneralizations. In the first half of the review, I summarize Geaney's solid conclusions: knowledge in Warring States texts was stated in terms of, and even constituted by, seeing and hearing (as opposed to the primacy of sight in the West); seeing and hearing were referred to in paired tropes; the epistemology of seeing and hearing generally involved moral evaluation; and the heartmind had a triple role in this process as verifier, as ruler, and as a sense in its own right. In the second half of the review, I demonstrate the limitations of Geaney's methodology, using her example of the relationship of qi and wind.
Keywords Chinese philosophy  Early China  Ancient China  Epistemology  Knowledge  Senses  Perception  Qi  Wind  Heartmind
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,683
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Dialogues Between Western and Eastern Culture From the Aspect of Logic.Xiong Liwen - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 36:83-90.
Action and Agency in Early Chinese Thought.Chris Fraser - 2009 - Journal of Chinese Philosophy and Culture 5:217–39.
Metaphor and Meaning in Early China.Edward Slingerland - 2011 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 10 (1):1-30.
Theory on the Cultivation of Cognitive Subjects in Chinese Philosophy.Quanxing Xu - 2008 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 3 (1):39-54.
Proposition, Definition and Inference in Ancient Chinese Philosophy.Ningzhong Shi - 2010 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 5 (3):414-431.
Knowledge and Error in Early Chinese Thought.Chris Fraser - 2011 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 10 (2):127-148.
Mencius and Early Chinese Thought.Kwong-loi Shun - 1997 - Stanford University Press.


Added to PP index

Total views
69 ( #159,278 of 2,462,427 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,313 of 2,462,427 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes