American Journal of Bioethics 21 (6):5-16 (2020)

Secular clinical ethics has responded to the problem of moral pluralism with a procedural approach. However, defining this term stirs debate: H. Tristram Engelhardt Jr. has championed a contentless proceduralism, while others, conversely, argue for a proceduralism that permits some content in the form of moral claims. This paper argues that the content P2 permits ought to be expanded to include some metaphysical commitments, in an approach referred to as P2+. The need for P2+ is demonstrated by analyzing and rejecting three standards used by P2 to justify overriding religiously motivated refusals of treatment for children. These approaches fail because each maintains a neutral stance regarding the truth of religious belief. This paper drives at the broader thesis that the proceduralism of secular clinical ethics requires some moral and metaphysical commitments.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2021
DOI 10.1080/15265161.2020.1863512
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,159
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Null. Null - 2016 - Philosophy Study 6 (9).
Taxonomizing Views of Clinical Ethics Expertise.Erica K. Salter & Abram Brummett - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (11):50-61.

View all 36 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Strangers at the Altar.Ana Iltis - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (6):19-22.
Bioethicist as Partisan Ideologue.Mark J. Cherry - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (6):22-25.
An Anatheistic Wager for Bioethics.Michael McCarthy - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (6):26-28.
Metaphysics, Reason, and Religion in Secular Clinical Ethics.Jason T. Eberl - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (6):17-18.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Whose Harm? Which Metaphysic?Abram Brummett - 2019 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 40 (1):43-61.
What is a Religious Ethic?John P. Reeder Jr - 1997 - Journal of Religious Ethics 25 (3):157 - 181.
What is a Religious Ethic?John P. Reeder - 1997 - Journal of Religious Ethics 25 (3):157-181.
Is, Ought, and the Regress Argument.Jacob Sparks - 2019 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 97 (3):528-543.
Debating Ethical Expertise.Norbert L. Steinkamp, Bert Gordijn & Henk A. . M. . J. Ten Have - 2008 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 18 (2):173-192.


Added to PP index

Total views
12 ( #788,640 of 2,454,829 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,241 of 2,454,829 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes