Journal of Moral Philosophy 8 (2):223-245 (2011)

Authors
Fabrice Teroni
Université de Neuchâtel
Abstract
The connection between shame, guilt and morality is the topic of many recent debates. A broad tendency consists in attributing a higher moral status and a greater moral relevance to guilt, a claim motivated by arguments that tap into various areas of morality and moral psychology. The Pro-social Argument has it that guilt is, contrary to shame, morally good since it promotes pro-social behaviour. Three other arguments claim that only guilt has the requisite connection to central moral concepts: the Responsibility Argument appeals to the ties between guilt and responsibility, the Autonomy Argument to the heteronomy of shame and the Social Argument to shame's link with reputation. In this paper, we scrutinize these arguments and argue that they cannot support the conclusion that they try to establish. We conclude that a narrow focus on particular criteria and a misconception of shame and guilt have obscured the important roles shame plays in our moral lives
Keywords autonomy  shame  guilt  responsibility  pro-social behaviour
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1163/174552411X563574
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,147
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

An Apology for Moral Shame.Cheshire Calhoun - 2004 - Journal of Political Philosophy 12 (2):127–146.
Differentiating Shame From Guilt.Julien A. Deonna & Fabrice Teroni - 2008 - Consciousness and Cognition 17 (4):1063-1400..
Differentiating Shame From Guilt ☆.Fabrice Teroni & Julien A. Deonna - 2008 - Consciousness and Cognition 17 (3):725-740.
Evolution, Social Roles, and the Differences in Shame and Guilt.Paul Gilbert - 2003 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 70 (4):1205-1230.
The Moral Relevance of Shame.Jennifer C. Manion - 2002 - American Philosophical Quarterly 39 (1):73 - 90.

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Honor and Moral Revolution.Victor Kumar & Richmond Campbell - 2016 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 19 (1):147-59.
Qual a motivação para se defender uma teoria causal da memória?César Schirmer Dos Santos - 2018 - In Juliano Santos do Carmo & Rogério F. Saucedo Corrêa (eds.), Linguagem e cognição. Pelotas: NEPFil. pp. 63-89.
Guit, Anger, and Retribution.Raffaele Rodogno - 2010 - Legal Theory 16 (1):59-76.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-01-21

Total views
295 ( #23,773 of 2,324,601 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
16 ( #39,297 of 2,324,601 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes