Shoemaker on second-order belief


Abstract
In a number of papers, Sydney Shoemaker has argued that first-order belief plus rationality implies second-order belief. This paper is a critical discussion of Shoemaker's argument.
Keywords Belief  Epistemology  Paradox  Self-knowledge  Shoemaker, S
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0031-8205
DOI 10.2307/2653514
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 46,405
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Self-Knowledge, Rationality and Moore’s Paradox.Jordi Fernández - 2005 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 71 (3):533-556.
How Speckled is the Hen?Bence Nanay - 2009 - Analysis 69 (3):499-502.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Shoemaker’s Problem of Too Many Thinkers.David B. Hershenov - 2006 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 80:225-236.
Shoemaker, Self-Blindness and Moore's Paradox.Amy Kind - 2003 - Philosophical Quarterly 53 (210):39-48.
The Possibility of Absent Qualia.Earl Conee - 1985 - Philosophical Review 94 (July):345-66.
Self-Knowledge, Rationality and Moore’s Paradox.Jordi Fernández - 2005 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 71 (3):533-556.
Thoughts on Sydney Shoemaker’s Physical Realization.Jaegwon Kim - 2010 - Philosophical Studies 148 (1):101 - 112.
Shoemaker on Self-Knowledge and Inner Sense.Cynthia Macdonald - 1999 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59 (3):711-38.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
71 ( #123,596 of 2,286,271 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
13 ( #64,982 of 2,286,271 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature