The Different Moral Bases of Patient and Surrogate Decision‐Making
Hastings Center Report 48 (1):37-41 (2018)
Abstract
My topic is a problem with our practice of surrogate decision-making in health care, namely, the problem of the surrogate who is not doing her job—the surrogate who cannot be reached or the surrogate who seems to refuse to understand or to be unable to understand the clinical situation. The analysis raises a question about the surrogate who simply disagrees with the medical team. One might think that such a surrogate is doing her job—the team just doesn't like how she is doing it. My analysis raises the question of whether she should be overridden. In approaching this problem, I focus not on the range of difficulties in practice but on the underlying moral conceptual issue. My concern will be to show that the moral values that underpin patient decision-making are fundamentally different from those that underpin surrogate decision-making. Identifying the distinctions will set parameters for any successful solution to the “Who should decide?” question. A patient has a specific kind of moral right to make her own medical decisions. A surrogate has no analogous moral right to decide for someone else. We want the surrogate to make the decision because we believe that she has a relevant epistemological advantage over anyone else on the scene. If and when she has no such advantage or if she refuses or is unable to use it, then there might not be sufficient reason to let her be the decision-maker.Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
The not unreasonable standard for assessment of surrogates and surrogate decisions.Rosamond Rhodes & Ian Holzman - 2004 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 25 (4):367-386.
Counterfactual reasoning in surrogate decision making – another look.Mats Johansson & Linus Broström - 2011 - Bioethics 25 (5):244-249.
Dementia and dignity: Towards a new method of surrogate decision making.Elysa R. Koppelman - 2002 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 27 (1):65 – 85.
Turning failures into successes: A methodological shortcoming in empirical research on surrogate accuracy.Mats Johansson & Linus Broström - 2008 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (1):17-26.
The Confucian bioethics of surrogate decision making: Its communitarian roots.Ruiping Fan - 2011 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 32 (5):301-313.
A Legal and Ethical Analysis of the Effects of Triggering Conditions on Surrogate Decision-Making in End-of-Life Care in the US.J. Clint Parker & Daniel S. Goldberg - 2016 - HEC Forum 28 (1):11-33.
Love as a Regulative Ideal in Surrogate Decision Making.Erica Lucast Stonestreet - 2014 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 39 (5):523-542.
Patient autonomy, assessment of competence and surrogate decision-making: A call for reasonableness in deciding for others.Kristine Baerøe - 2010 - Bioethics 24 (2):87-95.
Deciding for the Incompetent.Eric Vogelstein - 2017 - In John K. Davis (ed.), Ethics at the End of Life: New Issues and Arguments. New York: Routledge. pp. 108-125.
The Theory and Practice of Surrogate Decision‐Making.David Wendler - 2017 - Hastings Center Report 47 (1):29-31.
A qualitative investigation of selecting surrogate decision-makers.S. J. L. Edwards, P. Brown, M. A. Twyman, D. Christie & T. Rakow - 2011 - Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (10):601-605.
Patient autonomy, assessment of competence and surrogate decision‐making: A call for reasonableness in deciding for others.Kristine Bærøe - 2010 - Bioethics 24 (2):87-95.
“What the patient would have decided”: A fundamental problem with the substituted judgment standard. [REVIEW]Linus Broström, Mats Johansson & Morten Klemme Nielsen - 2006 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 10 (3):265-278.
Surrogate medical decision making on behalf of a never-competent, profoundly intellectually disabled patient who is acutely ill.Arvind Venkat - 2012 - Journal of Clinical Ethics 23 (1):71.
Should age be a deciding factor in ethical decision-making?Robert K. Pretzlaff - 2005 - Health Care Analysis 13 (2):119-128.
Analytics
Added to PP
2018-02-19
Downloads
22 (#522,071)
6 months
1 (#450,425)
2018-02-19
Downloads
22 (#522,071)
6 months
1 (#450,425)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Epistemic burdens and the incentives of surrogate decision-makers.Parker Crutchfield & Scott Scheall - 2019 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 22 (4):613-621.
Ethical reflection support for potential organ donors' relatives: A narrative review.Antoine Baumann, Nathalie Thilly, Liliane Joseph & Frédérique Claudot - 2022 - Nursing Ethics 29 (3):660-674.
The Intimate Responsibility of Surrogate Decision‐Making.Hilde Lindemann - 2018 - Hastings Center Report 48 (1):41-42.
References found in this work
Agency and authenticity: Which value grounds patient choice?Daniel Brudney & John Lantos - 2011 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 32 (4):217-227.
Hospital Ethics Committees: Is There a Role?Robert M. Veatch - 1977 - Hastings Center Report 7 (3):22-25.