Ethics and Information Technology 20 (1):15-26 (2018)
AbstractThe question of whether AI systems such as robots can or should be afforded moral agency or patiency is not one amenable either to discovery or simple reasoning, because we as societies constantly reconstruct our artefacts, including our ethical systems. Consequently, the place of AI systems in society is a matter of normative, not descriptive ethics. Here I start from a functionalist assumption, that ethics is the set of behaviour that maintains a society. This assumption allows me to exploit the theoretical biology of sociality and autonomy to explain our moral intuitions. From this grounding I extend to consider possible ethics for maintaining either human- or of artefact-centred societies. I conclude that while constructing AI systems as either moral agents or patients is possible, neither is desirable. In particular, I argue that we are unlikely to construct a coherent ethics in which it it is ethical to afford AI moral subjectivity. We are therefore obliged not to build AI we are obliged to.
Similar books and articles
Intelligent Design From the Viewpoint of Complex Systems Theory.Chunyu Dong - 2010 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 5 (3):461-470.
Improving the Design of Intelligent Systems: Outstanding Problems and Some Solutions.L. J. Kohout & I. Stabile - 1998 - Journal of Intelligent Systems 8 (3-4):225-238.
Beyond Simon’s Means-Ends Analysis: Natural Creativity and the Unanswered ‘Why’ in the Design of Intelligent Systems for Problem-Solving. [REVIEW]Dongming Xu - 2010 - Minds and Machines 20 (3):327-347.
Something Old, Something New, Something Borrowed, Something Blue Part 2: From Frankenstein to Battlefield Drones; A Perspective on Machine Ethics.Mark Dougherty - 2013 - Journal of Intelligent Systems 22 (1):1-7.
Something Old, Something New, Something Borrowed, Something Blue Part 1: Alan Turing, Hypercomputation, Adam Smith and Next Generation Intelligent Systems.Mark Dougherty - 2012 - Journal of Intelligent Systems 21 (4):325-330.
Human Centred Systems: An Urgent Problem for Systems Designers. [REVIEW]Mike Cooley - 1987 - AI and Society 1 (1):37-46.
Using Ethnography to Inform Systems Design.D. Randall, J. A. Hughes & D. Shapiro - 1994 - Journal of Intelligent Systems 4 (1-2):9-28.
Organizational Metaphors for the Design of Collaborative Systems.P. Thomas, J. Riddick & S. Dodd - 1994 - Journal of Intelligent Systems 4 (1-2):47-64.
Universal Principles of Intelligent System Design.Kirill Popov, Aamod Shanker & Debanjan Bhowmik - 2018 - Cosmos and History 14 (1):113-122.
An Intelligent Interface for Simulation Design.Benita Cox - 1995 - Journal of Intelligent Systems 5 (2-4):203-224.
Ethical Issues Concerning Expert Systems' Applications in Education.Marvin J. Croy - 1989 - AI and Society 3 (3):209-219.
Intelligent Systems as Cooperative Systems.L. G. Terveen - 1993 - Journal of Intelligent Systems 3 (2-4):217-250.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Welcoming Robots Into the Moral Circle: A Defence of Ethical Behaviourism.John Danaher - 2020 - Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (4):2023-2049.
Techno-optimism: an Analysis, an Evaluation and a Modest Defence.John Danaher - 2022 - Philosophy and Technology 35 (2):1-29.
In AI We Trust: Ethics, Artificial Intelligence, and Reliability.Mark Ryan - 2020 - Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (5):2749-2767.
The Philosophical Case for Robot Friendship.John Danaher - forthcoming - Journal of Posthuman Studies.
Debate: What is Personhood in the Age of AI?David J. Gunkel & Jordan Joseph Wales - 2021 - AI and Society 36:473–486.
References found in this work
Good Natured: The Origins of Right and Wrong in Humans and Other Animals.Frans de Waal - 1996 - Harvard University Press.