The Conventionalist Challenge to Natural Rights Theory

Social Theory and Practice 43 (3):569-587 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Call the conventionalist challenge to natural rights theory the claim that natural rights theory fails to capture the fact that moral rights are shaped by social and legal convention. While the conventionalist challenge is a natural concern, it is less than clear what this challenge amounts to. This paper aims to develop a clear formulation strong enough to put pressure on the natural rights theorist and precise enough to clarify what an adequate response would require.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 99,533

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Are There Natural Rights?Mark Tunick - 1995 - Proceedings of the Hegel Society of America 12:219-235.
Are there Natural Rights?--Hegel's Break with Kant.Mark Tunick - 1994 - In Ardis B. Collins (ed.), Hegel on the Modern World. State University of New York Press.
Racial Rights and Wrongs.Charles W. Mills - 2015 - Radical Philosophy Review 18 (1):11-30.
Rights.Carlos Nino (ed.) - 1992 - New York, NY: New York University Press.
Classical natural law theory, property rights, and taxation.Edward Feser - 2010 - Social Philosophy and Policy 27 (1):21-52.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-08-24

Downloads
98 (#188,065)

6 months
9 (#344,489)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ben Bryan
University of Tennessee, Knoxville

Citations of this work

Ambidextrous Lockeanism.Billy Christmas - 2020 - Economics and Philosophy 36 (2):193-215.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references