International Journal of Philosophical Studies 20 (5):691-723 (2012)
Abstract The present paper suggests to consider Kierkegaard?s use of Abraham?s story in Fear and Trembling in regulative terms, that is, to consider it as a model ? not for our moral behaviour but rather for our religious behaviour. To do so, I first rely on recent literature to argue that Kierkegaard should be regarded as a distinctively post-Kantian philosopher: namely, a philosopher who goes beyond Kant in a way that is nevertheless true to the spirit of Kant?s original critical philosophy. Then, I present a post-Kantian reading of Fear and Trembling, focusing on the problematic implications that result from comparing this text with Hegel?s theory of recognition. Finally, I submit that sacrifice in Fear and Trembling is a regulative notion in a Kantian sense. This interpretation addresses some of the most problematic aspects of the text. I conclude that the regulativity of sacrifice may be regarded as an important and perhaps an essential component of Kierkegaard?s overall philosophical strategy
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
On Søren Kierkegaard: Dialogue, Polemics, Lost Intimacy, and Time.Edward F. Mooney - 2008 - Ars Disputandi 8:1566-5399.
Kierkegaard's Ethic of Love: Divine Commands and Moral Obligations.Evans C. Stephen - 2004 - Oxford University Press.
Hegel's Phenomenology: The Sociality of Reason.Terry P. Pinkard - 1994 - Cambridge University Press.
Freedom and Reason in Kant, Schelling, and Kierkegaard.Michelle Kosch - 2006 - Oxford University Press.
In Defense of Kant's Religion.Chris L. Firestone & Nathan A. Jacobs - 2008 - Indiana University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to Kierkegaard and Fear and Trembling.John Lippitt - 2003 - Routledge.
Fear and Trembling: Kierkegaard's Christian Work.Jerome I. Gellmann - 2001 - Faith and Philosophy 18 (1):61-74.
Self-Deception, Confusion, and Salvation in "Fear and Trembling" with "Works of Love".Amy Laura Hall - 2000 - Journal of Religious Ethics 28 (1):37 - 61.
Dilemmatic Deliberations In Kierkegaard's Fear and Trembling.Daniel Watts - 2011 - Faith and Philosophy 28 (2):174-189.
Kierkegaard's Ethicist: Fichte's Role in Kierkegaard's Construction of the Ethical Standpoint.Michelle Kosch - 2006 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 88 (3):261-295.
Enough is Enough! "Fear and Trembling" is Not About Ethics.Ronald M. Green - 1993 - Journal of Religious Ethics 21 (2):191-209.
Thinking Outside the Circle: The Place of Kierkegaard in Stern'sUnderstanding Moral Obligation.William Bristow - 2012 - Inquiry 55 (6):606-621.
Ii. Introduction to a Reappraisal of Fear and Trembling.Paul Dietrichson - 1969 - Inquiry 12 (1-4):236 – 245.
What Neither Abraham nor Johannes de Silentio Could Say.John Lippitt - 2008 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 82 (1):79-99.
God, Incarnation, and Metaphysics in Hegel's Philosophy of Religion.Paolo Diego Bubbio - 2014 - Sophia (4):1-19.
Kant's Sacrificial Turns.Paolo Diego Bubbio - 2013 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 73 (2):97-115.
Faith and the Suspension of the Ethical in Fear and Trembling.Andrew Cross - 2003 - Inquiry 46 (1):3 – 28.
Added to index2012-11-30
Total downloads20 ( #245,919 of 2,163,683 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #348,043 of 2,163,683 )
How can I increase my downloads?