On Bohr's response to EPR: II [Book Review]
Foundations of Physics 20 (8):929-941 (1990)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
In my reconstruction of Bohr's reply to the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen argument, I pointed out that Bohr showed explicitly, within the framework of the complementarity interpretation, how a locally maximal measurement on a subsystem S2 of a composite system S1+S2, consisting of two spatially separated subsystems, can make determinate both a locally maximal Boolean subalgebra for S2 and a locally maximal Boolean subalgebra for S1. As it stands, this response is open to an objection. In this note, I show that meeting the objection requires a modification of the complementarity thesis concerning what propositions can be taken as determinate, or what observables can be raken to have values, in a given measurement context
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.1007/BF00738373 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Quantum Logic, Conditional Probability, and Interference.Jeffrey Bub - 1982 - Philosophy of Science 49 (3):402-421.
On Bohr's Response to EPR: A Quantum Logical Analysis. [REVIEW]Jeffrey Bub - 1989 - Foundations of Physics 19 (7):793-805.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
On Bohr's Response to EPR: A Quantum Logical Analysis. [REVIEW]Jeffrey Bub - 1989 - Foundations of Physics 19 (7):793-805.
The EPR Paper and Bohr's Response: A Re-Assessment. [REVIEW]M. A. B. Whitaker - 2004 - Foundations of Physics 34 (9):1305-1340.
The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox Re-Examined.David H. Sharp - 1961 - Philosophy of Science 28 (3):225-233.
A Bohmian Response to Bohr's Complementarity.James T. Cushing - 1994 - In Jan Faye & Henry J. Folse (eds.), Niels Bohr and Contemporary Philosophy. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 57--75.
The Projection Postulate and Bohr's Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics.Paul Teller - 1980 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:201-223.
Maximal Beable Subalgebras of Quantum-Mechanical Observables.Hans Halvorson & Rob Clifton - 1999 - International Journal of Theoretical Physics 38:2441-2484.
Reconsidering Bohr's Reply to EPR.Hans Halvorson & Rob Clifton - 2001 - In T. Placek & J. Butterfield (eds.), Non-locality and Modality. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 3--18.
Bohr's Framework of Complementarity and the Realism Debate.Henry J. Folse - 1994 - In Jan Faye & Henry J. Folse (eds.), Niels Bohr and Contemporary Philosophy. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 119--139.
Bohr's Complementarity and Goldstein's Holism in Reflective Pragmatism.Klaus Meyer-Abich - 2004 - Mind and Matter 2 (2):91-103.
Reconstructing Bohr’s Reply to EPR in Algebraic Quantum Theory.Masanao Ozawa & Yuichiro Kitajima - 2012 - Foundations of Physics 42 (4):475-487.
Bohr's Response to Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen.David Z. Albert - 1992 - In Edna Ullmann-Margalit (ed.), The Scientific Enterprise. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 269--272.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2013-11-22
Total views
67 ( #150,850 of 2,419,597 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #542,420 of 2,419,597 )
2013-11-22
Total views
67 ( #150,850 of 2,419,597 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #542,420 of 2,419,597 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads