Philosophy and Theology 6 (2):117-135 (1991)
In this study of Marshall’s Christology in Conflict, the author deals with three questions and issues which can be raised regarding Marshall’s argument: his account of the historical shape of the problem, his critique of Rahner, and his use of Barth’s christology
|Keywords||Catholic Tradition Philosophy and Religion|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
The Appeal to Experience in the Christologies of Friedrich Schleiermacher and Karl Rahner. By Allen G. Jorgenson. Pp. X, 230, Peter Lang, 2007, $69.95. [REVIEW]Ryan G. Duns - 2012 - Heythrop Journal 53 (6):1038-1039.
Conceptual Foundations for Multidisciplinary Thinking.S. J. Kline - 1995 - Stanford University Press.
Karl Rahner's Christology of Symbol and Three Models of Christology.Joseph H. P. Wong - 1986 - Heythrop Journal 27 (1):1-25.
Karl Rahner's Christology of Symbol and Three Models of Christology.Sdb Joseph H. P. Wong - 1986 - Heythrop Journal 27 (1):1–25.
Rahner's “New Christology” in Foundations of Christian Faith.Mark F. Fischer - 2010 - Philosophy and Theology 22 (1/2):389-404.
The Preexistent Son: Recovering the Christologies of Matthew, Mark, and Luke. By Simon J. Gathercole.Patrick Madigan - 2008 - Heythrop Journal 49 (2):311–311.
Leadership and Ethics: Corporate Accountability to Whom, for What and by What Means? [REVIEW]John J. McCall - 2002 - Journal of Business Ethics 38 (1-2):133 - 139.
Toward a More Objective Understanding of the Evidence of Carcinogenic Risk.Deborah G. Mayo - 1988 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:489 - 503.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads11 ( #402,676 of 2,169,723 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #345,460 of 2,169,723 )
How can I increase my downloads?