Hypatia 29 (3):651-669 (2014)

Authors
Andrea R. Gammon
Delft University of Technology
Abstract
Geoengineering has been broadly and helpfully defined as “the intentional manipulation of the earth's climate to counteract anthropogenic climate change or its warming effects” (Corner and Pidgeon , 26). Although there exists a rapidly growing literature on the ethics of geoengineering, very little has been written about its gender dimensions. The authors consider four contexts in which geoengineering appears to have important gender dimensions: (1) the demographics of those pushing the current agenda, (2) the overall vision of control it involves, (3) the design of the particular technologies, and (4) whom geoengineering will most affect and benefit. After detailing these four gender dimensions, we consider three ways in which the geoengineering discourse could be enriched if it became more sensitive to issues of gender. These include increasing the focus on the concrete other, recognizing the socially transformative potential of geoengineering technologies, and engaging in value-sensitive design. Although ultimately remaining agnostic on the desirability of geoengineering, the paper brings gender considerations into a discussion from which they have been conspicuously absent
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/hypa.12083
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,379
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

View all 29 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Indigeneity in Geoengineering Discourses: Some Considerations.Kyle Powys Whyte - 2018 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 21 (3):289-307.
Climate Justice: A Literary Review.Thomas E. Randall - 2016 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 9 (1):246-262.
Democratic Authority to Geoengineer.Holly Lawford-Smith - 2020 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 23 (5):600-617.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Geoengineering and the Precautionary Principle.Kevin Elliott - 2010 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 24 (2):237-253.
Geoengineering as a Matter of Environmental Instrumentalism.Shane J. Ralston - forthcoming - In W. C. G. Burns & J. Blackstock (eds.), Geoengineering and Climate Change. Cambridge University Press.
Ethics and Intentional Climate Change.Dale Jamieson - 1996 - Climatic Change 33 (3):323--336.
Human Engineering and Climate Change.S. Matthew Liao, Anders Sandberg & Rebecca Roache - 2012 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 15 (2):206 - 221.
Geoengineering and Climate Change.W. C. G. Burns & J. Blackstock (eds.) - forthcoming - Cambridge University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-12-21

Total views
33 ( #347,938 of 2,519,650 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #166,923 of 2,519,650 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes