Has the problem of incompleteness rested on a mistake?

Mind 114 (456):889-913 (2005)

Abstract

A common objection to Russell's theory of descriptions concerns incomplete definite descriptions: uses of (for example) ‘the book is overdue’ in contexts where there is clearly more than one book. Many contemporary Russellians hold that such utterances will invariably convey a contextually determined complete proposition, for example, that the book in your briefcase is overdue. But according to the objection this gets things wrong: typically, when a speaker utters such a sentence, no facts about the context or the speaker's communicative intentions single out a particular description-theoretic proposition as the proposition expressed. However, this is an objection only if it is assumed that successful linguistic communication requires the hearer to identify a proposition uniquely intended by the speaker. We argue that this assumption is mistaken. On our view, no proposition, descriptive or referential, is uniquely intended in such a context; thus, no proposition can nor need be identified as the proposition expressed. One significant upshot is that, once the aforementioned assumption is rejected, incompleteness no longer poses a threat to Russell's theory of descriptions.

Download options

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,879

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
235 (#49,311)

6 months
1 (#386,016)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Gary Ostertag
CUNY Graduate Center

References found in this work

Vagueness.Timothy Williamson - 1994 - London and New York: Routledge.
Reference and Definite Descriptions.Keith S. Donnellan - 1966 - Philosophical Review 75 (3):281-304.
On Referring.Peter F. Strawson - 1950 - Mind 59 (235):320-344.
Thought and Reference.Kent Bach - 1987 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

View all 39 references / Add more references

Citations of this work

Demonstratives as Individual Concepts.Paul Elbourne - 2008 - Linguistics and Philosophy 31 (4):409-466.
A Century Later.Stephen Neale - 2005 - Mind 114 (456):809-871.

View all 20 citations / Add more citations