Philosophical Perspectives 24 (1):85-120 (2010)

Authors
Lara Buchak
Princeton University
Abstract
This paper addresses the question of whether gathering additional evidence is always rationally required, both from the point of view of instrumental rationality and of epistemic rationality. It is shown that in certain situations, it is not instrumentally rational to look for more evidence before making a decision. These are situations in which the risk of “misleading” evidence – a concept that has both instrumental and epistemic senses – is not offset by the gains from the possibility of non-misleading evidence. These situations also undermine a particular argument for the claim that it is epistemically rational to look for more evidence, though it is argued that the relationship between instrumental and epistemic rationality makes such arguments flawed to begin with. Furthermore, these situations show us that our epistemic and our practical goals sometimes point us in different directions, not merely because of our limited resources or because our desires are sometimes best served by being in particular epistemic states, but because of the nature of rational action.
Keywords evidence-gathering  epistemic norms  diachronic epistemic norms  evidence  misleading evidence  risk  risk-weighted expected utility
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1520-8583.2010.00186.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,319
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Reasons and Persons.Derek Parfit - 1984 - Oxford University Press.
Epistemology and Cognition.Alvin I. Goldman - 1986 - Harvard University Press.
Reasons and Persons.Joseph Margolis - 1986 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 47 (2):311-327.
Risk and Rationality.Lara Buchak - 2013 - Oxford University Press.

View all 27 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

A Faithful Response to Disagreement.Lara Buchak - 2021 - The Philosophical Review 130 (2):191-226.
Can It Be Rational to Have Faith?Lara Buchak - 2012 - In Jake Chandler & Victoria Harrison (eds.), Probability in the Philosophy of Religion. Oxford University Press. pp. 225.
Rational Faith and Justified Belief.Lara Buchak - 2014 - In Timothy O'Connor & Laura Frances Callahan (eds.), Religious Faith and Intellectual Virtue. Oxford University Press. pp. 49-73.
Checking Again.Jane Friedman - 2019 - Philosophical Issues 29 (1):84-96.

View all 14 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-12-30

Total views
575 ( #12,231 of 2,448,697 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
38 ( #18,032 of 2,448,697 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes