Journal of Applied Philosophy 26 (3):276-290 (2009)
abstract Part 1 of this essay argues that one of the most important contributions of philosophers to sound public policy may be to combat the influence of bad Philosophy (which includes, but is not limited to, bad Philosophy produced by accredited academic philosophers). Part 2 argues that the conventional conception of Practical Ethics (CPE) that philosophers bring to issues of public policy is defective because it fails to take seriously the phenomenon of the subversion of morality, the role of false factual beliefs in this subversion, and the vulnerability to the exploitation of our moral powers that our social-epistemic dependency entails. Given the serious risks of the subversion of morality through the propagation of false factual beliefs, CPE's near exclusive emphasis on identifying sound moral principles greatly constrains its potential contribution to the Negative Task of Practical Ethics, the endeavour to reduce the incidence of the most grievously wrong behaviour. Practical ethicists should focus more on the ethics of believing, and develop a more sophisticated conception of the moral and epistemic virtues of individuals and of institutions, one that includes protective meta-virtues, whose function it is to guard us against the more frequent and predictable subversions of morality, including those subversions that are facilitated by the processes of belief-formation that our social institutions and practices foster.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Epistemic Virtues in Business.Boudewijn de Bruin - 2013 - Journal of Business Ethics 113 (4):583-595.
Cognitive Enhancement, Virtue Ethics and the Good Life.Barbro Fröding - 2010 - Neuroethics 4 (3):1-12.
Addressing Poverty and Climate Change: The Varieties of Social Engagement.Simon Caney - 2012 - Ethics and International Affairs 26 (2):191-216.
An Introduction of Epistemology to Business Ethics: A Study of Marketing Middle-Managers. [REVIEW]Mohammed Y. A. Rawwas, Surendra Arjoon & Yusuf Sidani - 2013 - Journal of Business Ethics 117 (3):525-539.
Similar books and articles
Beyond Serving a Purpose: Additional Ethical Focuses for Public Policy Agents.Vanessa Scholes - 2011 - In Jonathan Boston, Andrew Bradstock & David Eng (eds.), Ethics and public policy: contemporary issues. Victoria University Press.
Public Philosophy: Distinction Without Authority.Paul T. Menzel - 1990 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 15 (4):411-424.
Economic Analysis, Moral Philosophy, and Public Policy.Daniel M. Hausman - 2006 - Cambridge University Press.
Towards More Confidence: About the Roles of Social Scientists in Participatory Policy Making.Corinna Jung - 2009 - Poiesis and Praxis 6 (1-2):125-129.
Epistemic Inertia and Epistemic Isolationism: A Response to Buchanan.Neil C. Manson - 2009 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 26 (3):291-298.
Philosophers and the Public Policy Process: Inside, Outside, or Nowhere at All?Richard W. Momeyer - 1990 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 15 (4):391-409.
Philosophy, Social Institutions, and the Ethics of Belief: A Response to Buchanan.Alan Carter - 2009 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 26 (3):299-306.
Added to index2009-07-14
Total downloads143 ( #31,071 of 2,143,794 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #163,222 of 2,143,794 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.