The Marxist Conceptual Framework and the Origins of Totalitarian Socialism

Social Philosophy and Policy 3 (2):127 (1986)
Abstract
One of the few things modern liberals, classical liberals, and conservatives can agree on is the charge that some of the worst features oftotalitarian socialist regimes have their origins in the writings of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. Nevertheless, the nature of this claim, and therefore the reasons for accepting or rejecting it, are oftenleft obscure. If it is understood simply as a causal statement, then it must be confirmed or disconfirmed by empirical social science. The political philosopher can at most assist by providing a clear characterization of the conceptual content of the beliefs which constitute the independent variable in the alleged causal relation: those beliefs concerning Marx's and Engels's thoughts which are said to have exerted the causal influence in question. Even if empirical research did showthat beliefs about Marxist theory were a significant causal influencein the rise of certain features of totalitarian socialism, this wouldbe of limited philosophical interest if the beliefs in question were misunderstandings of the theory and if the correct explanationof why these misunderstandings occurred appealed to factors external to the theory itself. However, it would be of considerable philosophical interest if correct beliefs about Marxist theory exerted a causalinfluence on some of the more undesirable aspects of totalitarian socialism, or if incorrect beliefs did and the existence of thesemisunderstandings could be traced to ambiguities or gaps in the Marxist theory itself. The political philosopher has a legitimate interestin the relationship between the writings of Marx and Engels on the rise of totalitarian socialism, not because he is interested in articulating and testing causal connections between beliefs and social phenomena in general, but because Marxist theory is supposed – by its authors – to inspire and guide change toward a better society
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0265052500000339
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,567
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Scientific Socialism and Democracy: A Response to Femia.John O'Neill - 1986 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 29 (1-4):345-353.
Has History Refuted Marxism?Richard Hudelson - 1993 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 23 (2):180-198.
Several Considerations About the Totalitarian Personality Concept.Dan Ioan Dascalu - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 50:125-131.
Market Socialism and Non-Utopian Marxist Theory.Lesley A. Jacobs - 1999 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 29 (4):527-539.
On Marx.Wendy Lynne Lee - 2001 - Wadsworth.
Marxism and Ideology.Ferruccio Rossi-Landi - 1990 - Oxford University Press.
Added to PP index
2010-08-31

Total downloads
11 ( #409,490 of 2,180,898 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #299,591 of 2,180,898 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums