Journal of Business Ethics 82 (4):821-834 (2008)
AbstractTechnological advances in media communications have raised questions about the appropriateness of media ownership rules for traditional TV and radio broadcast. This article contributes to this debate by defending a set of principles that ought to govern the distribution of broadcast spectrum. In particular, it defends principles reflecting the ‹public interest’ constraint currently informing broadcast media ownership rules, and argues against a free-market procedure for distributing spectrum use. The argument relies upon the application of a political constructivist approach typical to many political theories. In applying this approach, the author illustrates the strengths and weakness of constructivism and in the process provide an example for how constructivism can be applied to other subjects. As a result, the article has two aims. First, it defends a set of broadcast ownership principles. Second, it provides a model for how philosophers might apply constructivism to other subjects.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
No references found.
Similar books and articles
Self-Ownership and the State: A Democratic Critique.Lea Ypi - 2011 - Ratio 24 (1):91-106.
Mocking the News: How The Daily Show with Jon Stewart Holds Traditional Broadcast News Accountable.Chad Painter & Louis Hodges - 2010 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 25 (4):257-274.
The Decline of Broadcast Ethics: U.S. V. Nab.Val E. Limburg - 1989 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 4 (2):214 – 231.
Ownership and Justice: Volume 27, Part 1.Ellen Frankel Paul, Miller Jr & Jeffrey Paul (eds.) - 2010 - Cambridge University Press.
Communication, Media, and American Society: A Critical Introduction.Daniel W. Rossides - 2002 - Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Oligopolization of Global Media and Telecommunications and its Implications for Democracy.Barney Warf - 2007 - Ethics, Place and Environment 10 (1):89 – 105.
Is Private Capital Possible Within the Ownership Structure of Contemporary Soviet Society?S. I. Samygin & G. S. Denisova - 1991 - Russian Studies in Philosophy 30 (3):43-59.
Who Said That? Status Presentation in Media Accounts of the Animal Experimentation Debate.Corwin R. Kruse - 1998 - Society and Animals 6 (3):235-243.
Children Apply Principles of Physical Ownership to Ideas.Alex Shaw, Vivian Li & Kristina R. Olson - 2012 - Cognitive Science 36 (8):1383-1403.
Failed States in Education: Chomsky on Dissent, Propaganda, and Reclaiming Democracy in the Media Spectacle.Aaron Cooley - 2010 - Educational Studies: A Jrnl of the American Educ. Studies Assoc 46 (6):579-605.
Social Responsibility Worldwide.Clifford Christians & Kaarle Nordenstreng - 2004 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 19 (1):3 – 28.
The Kibbutz's Adjustment to Industrialization and Ideological Decline: Alternatives for Economic Organization.Stephen Charles Mott - 1991 - Journal of Religious Ethics 19 (1):151 - 173.
Media Concentration and Minority Ownership: The Intersection of Ellul and Habermas.John O. Omachonu & Kevin Healey - 2009 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 24 (2-3):90 – 109.