A labeled argumentation framework

Journal of Applied Logic 13 (4):534-553 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Argumentation is a form of reasoning where a claim is accepted or rejected according to the analysis of the arguments for and against it; furthermore, it provides a reasoning mechanism able to handle contradictory, incomplete and uncertain information in real-world situations. We combine Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks (an extension of Dung’s work) with an Algebra of Argumentation Labels modeling two independent types of interaction between arguments, representing meta-information associated with arguments, and introducing an acceptability notion that will give more information for arguments acceptability.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 98,098

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Bayesian approach to forward and inverse abstract argumentation problems.Hiroyuki Kido & Beishui Liao - 2022 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 32 (4):273-304.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-30

Downloads
26 (#711,512)

6 months
8 (#471,862)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?