Synthese 190 (15):3185-3207 (2013)

Authors
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to provide a model that allows the representation and analysis of circularity in ethotic structures, i.e. in communication structures related to the speaker’s character and in particular, his credibility. The paper studies three types of cycles: in self-referential sentences, embedded testimony and ethotic begging the question. It is shown that standard models allow the reconstruction of the circularities only if those circular utterances are interpreted as ethotic arguments. Their alternative, assertive interpretation requires enriching the existing models with a purely ethotic component related to the credibility of the performer of any (not necessarily argumentative) speech act
Keywords Argumentation theory  Argumentation schemes  Ethotic argument  Dialogue  Circular reasoning  Circular reference  Ethos  Credibility of speaker
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s11229-012-0135-6
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,274
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Fallacies.C. L. Hamblin - 1970 - Vale Press.
Argumentation Schemes.Douglas Walton, Chris Reed & Fabrizio Macagno - 2008 - Cambridge University Press.

View all 19 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Freedom, Determinism and Circular Reasoning.Gary Colwell - 1994 - Argumentation 8 (3):251-263.
Is Descartes's Reasoning Viciously Circular?Markus Lammenranta - 2006 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 14 (2):323 – 330.
Ēthotic Argument.Alan Brinton - 1986 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 3 (3):245 - 258.
Circular Justifications.Harold I. Brown - 1994 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:406 - 414.
Yablo's Paradox and Referring to Infinite Objects.O. Bueno & M. Colyvan - 2003 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81 (3):402 – 412.
Argumentation Schemes.Douglas Walton, Chris Reed & Fabrizio Macagno - 2008 - Cambridge University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-12-21

Total views
67 ( #159,414 of 2,448,630 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,192 of 2,448,630 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes