Climate Policy 20 (2020)

Authors
Mark Budolfson
Rutgers University - New Brunswick
Blake Francis
University of Maryland, Baltimore County
Abstract
Transparency and openness are broadly endorsed in energy and environmental modelling and analysis, but too little attention is given to the transparency of value-laden assumptions. Current practices for transparency focus on making model source code and data available, documenting key equations and parameter values, and ensuring replicability of results. We argue that, even when followed, these guidelines are insufficient for achieving deep transparency, in the sense that results often remain driven by implicit value-laden assumptions that are opaque to other modellers and researchers, and that may not be understood by wider audiences to be controversial. This paper identifies additional best practices for achieving transparency by highlighting issues where disagreement over value judgements will persist for the foreseeable future. Recommendations for deepening transparency are developed by learning from successes and ongoing challenges represented in three case studies. We provide recommendations to accelerate the adoption of additional best practices for deepening transparency of energy and environmental modelling in policy-relevant domains, increasing stakeholder participation with non-modellers, and encouraging interdisciplinary dialogue.
Keywords transparency  modelling  economic analysis  uncertainty  values  energy and environmental policy
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,107
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Choices, Values, and Frames.Daniel Kahneman & Amos Tversky (eds.) - 2000 - Cambridge University Press.
Discounting the Future.John Broome - 1994 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 23 (2):128-156.

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Transparency in Complex Computational Systems.Kathleen A. Creel - 2020 - Philosophy of Science 87 (4):568-589.
Transparency: The Key to Better Governance?Christopher Hood & David Heald - unknown - Proceedings of the British Academy 135.
Rights and Wrongs of Economic Modelling: Refining Rodrik.Uskali Mäki - 2018 - Journal of Economic Methodology 25 (3):218-236.
Transparency, Interrupted.Clare Birchall - 2011 - Theory, Culture and Society 28 (7-8):60-84.
Acquiring a Concept of Visual Experience.Austin Andrews - 2020 - Philosophical Quarterly 70 (279):223-245.
Heirs of Nothing: The Implications of Transparency.Matthew Kennedy - 2009 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 79 (3):574-604.
Isolation Is Not Characteristic of Models.Till Grüne-Yanoff - 2011 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 25 (2):119 - 137.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-07-25

Total views
9 ( #927,828 of 2,454,628 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,377 of 2,454,628 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes