Objectivity and the aesthetic value of nature: Reply to Parsons

British Journal of Aesthetics 46 (3):267-273 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX


The Aesthetic Appreciation of Nature I advance a view of the aesthetic value of nature that Glenn Parsons seeks to contest. Here I attempt to show three things. The first is that his critique of my view of the aesthetic value of a natural thing is malfounded. The second is that his proposed alternative, which is intended to vindicate the claim to objectivity of certain judgements of the aesthetic value of a natural thing, is unconvincing. And the third is that, contrary to what he maintains, I am not committed to the alternative he proposes through an apparent tension in my position, for there is no such tension.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 86,168

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Riddle of aesthetic principles.Vojko Strahovnik - 2004 - Acta Analytica 19 (33):189-208.
Science, Nature, and Moore's Syncretic Aesthetic.Glenn Parsons - 2009 - Ethics, Place and Environment 12 (3):351-356.
The aesthetic appreciation of nature.Malcolm Budd - 1996 - British Journal of Aesthetics 36 (3):207-222.
Freedom and objectivity in the aesthetic appreciation of nature.Glenn Parsons - 2006 - British Journal of Aesthetics 46 (1):17-37.


Added to PP

136 (#114,562)

6 months
1 (#862,753)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Reflections on a Sofa Bed: Functional Beauty and Looking Fit.Rafael De Clercq - 2013 - Journal of Aesthetic Education 47 (2):35-48.
¿Qué significa apreciar la “naturaleza” como naturaleza?Sixto J. Castro - 2015 - Revista de Filosofía (Madrid) 40 (2):127-141.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references