Principia 12 (2):177-192 (2008)
http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/1808-1711.2008v12n2p177 Can a constructive empiricist make sense of scientific representation? Usually, a scientific model is an abstract entity (e.g., formulated in set theory), and scientific representation is conceptualized as an intentional relation between scientific models and certain aspects of the world. On this conception, since both the models and the representation relation are abstract, a constructive empiricist, who is not committed to the existence of abstract entities, would be unable to invoke these notions to make sense of scientific representation. In this paper, instead of understanding representation as a relation between abstract entities, I focus on the activity of representing, and argue that it provides a way of making sense of representation within the boundaries of empiricism. The activity of representing doesn’t deal with abstract entities, but with concrete ones, such as inscriptions, templates, and blueprints. In the end, by examining the practice of representing, rather than an artificially reified product—the representation—the constructive empiricist has the resources to make sense of scientific representation in empiricist terms
|Keywords||Microscopia Nominalismo Representação científica Empirismo construtivo Imagens científicas Bas van Fraassen|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
When Physics and Biology Meet: The Nanoscale Case.Otávio Bueno - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 42 (2):180-189.
When Physics and Biology Meet: The Nanoscale Case.Otávio Bueno - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 42 (2):180-189.
Similar books and articles
Models as Make-Believe.Adam Toon - 2010 - In Roman Frigg & Matthew Hunter (eds.), Beyond Mimesis and Convention: Representation in Art and Science. Boston Studies in Philosophy of Science.
Empiricist Structuralism, Metaphysical Realism, and the Bridging Problem.Gabriele Contessa - 2010 - Analysis 70 (3):514-524.
Essay Review: Scientific Representation and Empiricist Structuralism*:Scientific Representation: Paradoxes of Perspective.Ronald N. Giere - 2009 - Philosophy of Science 76 (1):101-111.
Constructive Empiricism and Epistemic Modesty: Response to van Fraassen and Monton. [REVIEW]Marc Alspector-Kelly - 2006 - Erkenntnis 64 (3):371-379.
Constructive Empiricism and Scientific Practice. A Case Study.Valeriano Iranzo - 2002 - Theoria 17 (2):335-357.
Representing with Imaginary Models: Formats Matter.Marion Vorms - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42 (2):287-295.
On McMullin's Appreciation of Realism Concerning the Sciences.Bas C. van Fraassen - 2003 - Philosophy of Science 70 (3):479-492.
Scientific Representation: Paradoxes of Perspective.C. Van Fraassen Bas - 2008 - Oxford University Press.
Added to index2013-04-12
Total downloads108 ( #46,214 of 2,171,691 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #173,816 of 2,171,691 )
How can I increase my downloads?