The Monist 98 (3):233-245 (2015)

Scott Shalkowski
University of Leeds
Otávio Bueno
University of Miami
Jacob Busch
University of Aarhus
In this paper we argue that there are no categories of being⎯at least not in the robust metaphysical sense of something fundamental. Central arguments that metaphysicians provide in support of fundamental categories, such as indispensability and theoretical utility arguments, are not adequate to guarantee their existence. We illustrate this point by examining Jonathan Lowe’s [2006] four-category ontology, and indicating its shortcomings. In contrast, we offer an alternative, no-category ontology, which dispenses with any fundamental categories of being, and provides a deflationary understanding of any categorization in terms of concepts. Concepts, we insist, as opposed to fundamental ontological categories, can always be revised, refined, and recast. A distinctive deflationary, no-category ontology then emerges
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/monist/onv014
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,229
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

What is a Law of Nature?D. M. Armstrong - 1983 - Cambridge University Press.
The Indispensability of Mathematics.Mark Colyvan - 2001 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
What is a Law of Nature?David M. Armstrong - 1983 - Cambridge University Press.
Every Thing Must Go: Metaphysics Naturalized.James Ladyman & Don Ross - 2007 - In James Ladyman, Don Ross, David Spurrett & John Collier (eds.), Every Thing Must Go: Metaphysics Naturalized. Oxford University Press.

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Categories.Javier Cumpa - 2020 - Philosophy Compass 15 (1).

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Defining 'Ontological Category'.Jan Westerhoff - 2002 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 102 (3):287–293.
Some Formal Ontological Relations.E. J. Lowe - 2004 - Dialectica 58 (3):297–316.
The Construction of Ontological Categories.Jan Westerhoff - 2004 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 82 (4):595 – 620.
A New Realistic Spirit: The Analytical and the Existential Approaches to Ontology.Heinrich Watzka - 2011 - Forum Philosophicum: International Journal for Philosophy 16 (1):7-28.
Photographs and the Ontology of the Real.Guy Rohrbaugh - 1999 - Dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles
New Categories for Formal Ontology.Peter Simons - 1994 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 49 (1):77-99.
Axiomatizing a Category of Categories.Colin McLarty - 1991 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 56 (4):1243-1260.


Added to PP index

Total views
52 ( #206,984 of 2,455,424 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #225,815 of 2,455,424 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes