“Tricking the Brain” Using Immersive Virtual Reality: Modifying the Self-Perception Over Embodied Avatar Influences Motor Cortical Excitability and Action Initiation
Karin A. Buetler, Joaquin Penalver-Andres, Özhan Özen, Luca Ferriroli, René M. Müri, Dario Cazzoli & Laura Marchal-Crespo
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 15 (2022)
AbstractTo offer engaging neurorehabilitation training to neurologic patients, motor tasks are often visualized in virtual reality. Recently introduced head-mounted displays allow to realistically mimic the body of the user from a first-person perspective in a highly immersive VR environment. In this immersive environment, users may embody avatars with different body characteristics. Importantly, body characteristics impact how people perform actions. Therefore, alternating body perceptions using immersive VR may be a powerful tool to promote motor activity in neurologic patients. However, the ability of the brain to adapt motor commands based on a perceived modified reality has not yet been fully explored. To fill this gap, we “tricked the brain” using immersive VR and investigated if multisensory feedback modulating the physical properties of an embodied avatar influences motor brain networks and control. Ten healthy participants were immersed in a virtual environment using an HMD, where they saw an avatar from first-person perspective. We slowly transformed the surface of the avatar from human to stone. We enforced this visual change by repetitively touching the real arm of the participant and the arm of the avatar with a hammer, while progressively replacing the sound of the hammer against skin with stone hitting sound via loudspeaker. We applied single-pulse transcranial magnetic simulation to evaluate changes in motor cortical excitability associated with the illusion. Further, to investigate if the “stone illusion” affected motor control, participants performed a reaching task with the human and stone avatar. Questionnaires assessed the subjectively reported strength of embodiment and illusion. Our results show that participants experienced the “stone arm illusion.” Particularly, they rated their arm as heavier, colder, stiffer, and more insensitive when immersed with the stone than human avatar, without the illusion affecting their experienced feeling of body ownership. Further, the reported illusion strength was associated with enhanced motor cortical excitability and faster movement initiations, indicating that participants may have physically mirrored and compensated for the embodied body characteristics of the stone avatar. Together, immersive VR has the potential to influence motor brain networks by subtly modifying the perception of reality, opening new perspectives for the motor recovery of patients.
Similar books and articles
Virtual Reality for Neurorehabilitation and Cognitive Enhancement.Danko D. Georgiev, Iva Georgieva, Zhengya Gong, Vijayakumar Nanjappan & Georgi V. Georgiev - 2021 - Brain Sciences 11 (2):221.
Changes in Bodily Awareness Induced by Immersive Virtual Reality.Craig D. Murray & Michael S. Gordon - 2001 - CyberPsychology and Behavior 4 (3):365-371.
Acute Effects of High-Intensity Aerobic Exercise on Motor Cortical Excitability and Inhibition in Sedentary Adults.Ashlee M. Hendy, Justin W. Andrushko, Paul A. Della Gatta & Wei-Peng Teo - 2022 - Frontiers in Psychology 13.
Perception, Action, and Motor Control: Interaction Does Not Necessarily Imply Common Structures.L. Pisella, A. Kritikos & Y. Rossetti - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):898-899.
Effects of Slow Oscillatory Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation on Motor Cortical Excitability Assessed by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.Asher Geffen, Nicholas Bland & Martin V. Sale - 2021 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 15.
The Relationship Between Conscious Phenomena and Physical Reality in Behaviour Control: The Need for Simplicity Through Phenomenological Clarity.Ralf-Peter Behrendt - 2008 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (1):22-23.
Affordance Compatibility Effect for Word Learning in Virtual Reality.Chelsea L. Gordon, Timothy M. Shea, David C. Noelle & Ramesh Balasubramaniam - 2019 - Cognitive Science 43 (6):e12742.
Age-Related Differences With Immersive and Non-Immersive Virtual Reality in Memory Assessment.Adéla Plechatá, Václav Sahula, Dan Fayette & Iveta Fajnerová - 2019 - Frontiers in Psychology 10.
Perceiving What You Intend to Do From What You Do: Evidence for Embodiment in Social Interactions.Francois Quesque & Yann Coello - 2015 - Socioaffective Neuroscience and Psychology 5.
Embodied Social Presence Theory.Brian Mennecke, Janea L. Triplett, Lesya M. Hassall, Rex Heer & Zayira Jordán Conde - unknown
Immersed Into Our Clothes. Are Wearable Technologies a Potential Gateway to Extra-Virtual Immersion?Ludovica Fales - unknown
Performing Phenomenology: Negotiating Presence in Intermedial Theatre. [REVIEW]Kurt Vanhoutte & Nele Wynants - 2011 - Foundations of Science 16 (2-3):275-284.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
No citations found.
References found in this work
What is Embodiment? A Psychometric Approach.Matthew R. Longo, Friederike Schüür, Marjolein P. M. Kammers, Manos Tsakiris & Patrick Haggard - 2008 - Cognition 107 (3):978-998.
Having a Body Versus Moving Your Body: How Agency Structures Body-Ownership.Manos Tsakiris, Gita Prabhu & Patrick Haggard - 2006 - Consciousness and Cognition 15 (2):423-432.
The “Sense of Agency” and its Underlying Cognitive and Neural Mechanisms.Nicole David, Albert Newen & Kai Vogeley - 2008 - Consciousness and Cognition 17 (2):523-534.
The Senses of Agency and Ownership: A Review.Niclas Braun, Stefan Debener, Nadine Spychala, Edith Bongartz, Peter Sörös, Helge H. O. Müller & Alexandra Philipsen - 2018 - Frontiers in Psychology 9.