Balancing Procreative Autonomy and Parental Responsibility

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 20 (2):268-276 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In Rationality and the Genetic Challenge: Making People Better? Matti Häyry provides a clear and informed discussion and analysis of a number of competing answers to the above questions. Häyry describes three main perspectives on the morality of prenatal genetic diagnosis , the “restrictive,” “moderate,” and “permissive” views, and his analysis illuminates that these views can be distinguished in terms of their different “rationalities”—their respective understanding of what counts as a reasonable choice for parents to make in light of PGD

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,290

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Nonconfrontational Rationality or Critical Reasoning.Vilhjálmur Árnason - 2011 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 20 (2):228-237.
Are All Rational Moralities Equivalent?Darryl Gunson - 2011 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 20 (2):238-247.
The Challenge of Nonconfrontational Ethics.John Harris - 2011 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 20 (2):204-215.
Toleration and Healthcare Ethics.Raanan Gillon - 2005 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 14 (1):100-106.
Autonomy and freedom of choice in prenatal genetic diagnosis.Elisabeth Hildt - 2002 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 5 (1):65-72.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-09

Downloads
74 (#279,718)

6 months
14 (#214,836)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Tom Buller
Illinois State University
Stephanie Bauer
University of Alaska, Anchorage