Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (1):67-68 (1997)
I suggest that the difficulties inherent in discovering the hidden regularities in realistic (type-2) problems can often be resolved by learning algorithms employing simple constraints (such as symmetry and the importance of local information) that are natural from an evolutionary point of view. Neither “heavy-duty nativism” nor “representational recoding” appear to offer totally appropriate descriptions of such natural learning processes.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
The Role of Explanation in Discovery and Generalization: Evidence From Category Learning.Joseph J. Williams & Tania Lombrozo - 2010 - Cognitive Science 34 (5):776-806.
Space Exploration and Environmental Issues.William K. Hartmann - 1984 - Environmental Ethics 6 (3):227-239.
The Dretske–Tooley–Armstrong Theory of Natural Laws and the Inference Problem.Joan Page`S. - 2002 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 16 (3):227-243.
The Dretske-Tooley-Armstrong Theory of Natural Laws and the Inference Problem.Joan Pag - 2002 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 16 (3):227 – 243.
Learning Local Transductions is Hard.Martin Jansche - 2004 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 13 (4):439-455.
Relational Learning Re-Examined.Chris Thornton & Andy Clark - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (1):83-83.
Generalization, Similarity, and Bayesian Inference.Joshua B. Tenenbaum & Thomas L. Griffiths - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (4):629-640.
Type-2 Problems Are Difficult to Learn, but Generalize Well (in General).M. Gareth Gaskell - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (1):73-73.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?