Ideology as cooperative affordance

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (6):515-516 (2009)

Abstract
McKay & Dennett (M&D) observe that beliefs need not be true in order to evolve. We connect this insight with Schelling's work on cooperative commitment to suggest that some beliefs are best approached as social goals. We explain why a social-interactive perspective is important to explaining the dynamics of belief formation and revision among situated partners
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s0140525x09991403
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 44,419
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Consciousness Explained.William G. Lycan & Daniel C. Dennett - 1993 - Philosophical Review 102 (3):424.
Why Aren’T We All Hutterites?Richard Sosis - 2003 - Human Nature 14 (2):91-127.

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Cost Do Not Explain Trust Among Secular Groups.John H. Shaver, Susan DiVietro, Martin Lang & Richard Sosis - 2018 - Journal of Cognition and Culture 18 (1-2):180-204.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-10-27

Total views
14 ( #591,621 of 2,272,190 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #566,516 of 2,272,190 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature