Studia Logica 41 (2-3):95 - 108 (1982)

The standard deduction theorem or introduction rule for implication, for classical logic is also valid for intuitionistic logic, but just as with predicate logic, other rules of inference have to be restricted if the theorem is to hold for weaker implicational logics.In this paper we look in detail at special cases of the Gentzen rule for and show that various subsets of these in effect constitute deduction theorems determining all the theorems of many well known as well as not well known implicational logics. In particular systems of rules are given which are equivalent to the relevance logics E,R, T, P-W and P-W-I.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00370338
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 55,935
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Entailment. Vol. 1.Alan Ross Anderson & Nuel D. Belnap - 1977 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 7 (2):405-411.
The System LD.Haskell B. Curry - 1952 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 17 (1):35-42.
Positive Logic and Λ-Constants.David Meredith - 1978 - Studia Logica 37 (3):269 - 285.

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
49 ( #202,325 of 2,403,176 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #552,147 of 2,403,176 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes