Creator/creatures relation: “The distinction” vs.“onto-theology”
Faith and Philosophy 25 (2):177-189 (2008)
Abstract
Can philosophical inquiry into divinity be authentic to its subject, God, without adapting its categories to the challenges of its scriptural inspiration, be that biblical or Quranic? This essay argues that it cannot, and that the adaptation, while it can be articulated in semantic terms, must rather amount to a transformation of standard philosophical strategies. Indeed, without such a radical transformation, “philosophy of religion” will inevitably mislead us into speaking of a “god” rather than our intended objectAuthor's Profile
ISBN(s)
0739-7046
DOI
10.5840/faithphil200825216
My notes
Similar books and articles
God’s spatial unlocatedness prevents him from being the creator of the universe: A new argument for the nonexistence of God.Jeffrey Grupp - 2006 - Sophia 45 (1):5-23.
Free Creatures of an Eternal God: Thomas Aquinas on God’s Foreknowledge and Irresistible Will.David Burrell - 1999 - International Philosophical Quarterly 39 (2):225-226.
Aquinas and Kierkegaard on the Relation between God and Creatures.Martin J. De Nys - 2001 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 75 (3):389-407.
The primacy of relation over substance and the recovery of a theological metaphysics.Adrian Pabst - 2007 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 81 (4):553-578.
God the Creator; on the Transcendence and Presence of God.Robert C. Neville - 1968 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Sovereignty and freedom: A reply to Rowe.Hugh J. Mccann - 2001 - Faith and Philosophy 18 (1):110-116.
Analytics
Added to PP
2011-01-09
Downloads
19 (#589,031)
6 months
1 (#448,894)
2011-01-09
Downloads
19 (#589,031)
6 months
1 (#448,894)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Divine determinism, human freedom, and the consequence argument.Leigh C. Vicens - 2012 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 71 (2):145-155.
References found in this work
The mystery of metaphysical freedom.Peter van Inwagen - 1998 - In Peter van Inwagen & Dean W. Zimmerman (eds.), Van Inwagen, P.; Zimmerman, D. Metaphysics: The Big Questions. Blackwell. pp. 365-373.
Did Aquinas Answer Cajetan’s Question? Aquinas’s Semantic Rules for Analogy and the Interpretation of De Nominum Analogia.Joshua P. Hochschild - 2003 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 77:273-288.