Mind 89 (355):391-405 (1980)
I aim to show that there are cases in which an ordinary material object exists intermittently. Afterwards there are a few words about the consequences of acknowledging such cases, but what is of more interest is the route by which the conclusion is reached. When deciding among competing descriptions of the cases considered, I have tried to reduce to a minimum the role of intuitive judgment, and I have based several arguments on "metaphysical principles," two of which I have defended.
|Keywords||intermittent existence coinciding objects stuff material constitution|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Object Persistence in Philosophy and Psychology.Brian J. Scholl - 2007 - Mind and Language 22 (5):563–591.
I—Kit Fine: Coincidence and Form.Kit Fine - 2008 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 82 (1):101-118.
Artifacts of Theseus: Fact and Fission.W. R. Carter - 1983 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 61 (3):248 – 265.
Similar books and articles
The Metaphysical Problem of Intermittent Existence and the Possibility of Resurrection.David Hershenov - 2003 - Faith and Philosophy 20 (1):24-36.
Fission, Cohabitation and the Concern for Future Survival.Rebecca Roache - 2010 - Analysis 70 (2):256-263.
Intermittent Existence and the Identity of Works of Art.Hilde Hein - 1958 - Review of Metaphysics 12 (4):633 - 638.
How to Defend the Cohabitation Theory.Simon Langford - 2007 - Philosophical Quarterly 57 (227):212–224.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads82 ( #64,097 of 2,172,701 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #46,318 of 2,172,701 )
How can I increase my downloads?