For better, for worse: Comparative orderings on states and theories

Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 83 (1):459-488 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In logic, including the designer logics of artificial intelligence, and in the philosophy of science, one is often concerned with qualitative, comparative orderings on the states of a system, or on theories expressing information about the system. States may be compared with respect to normality, or some preference criterium, or similarity to some given (set of) state(s). Theories may be compared with respect to logical power, or to truthlikeness, or to how well they capture certain information. We explain a number of these relations, study their properties, and unravel some of their interrelationships.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A recursion principle for linear orderings.Juha Oikkonen - 1992 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 57 (1):82-96.
Events.Frederick F. Schmitt - 1983 - Erkenntnis 20 (3):281 - 293.
Refined epistemic entrenchment.Thomas Andreas Meyer, Willem Adrian Labuschagne & Johannes Heidema - 2000 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 9 (2):237-259.
The frame problem and theories of belief.Scott Hendricks - 2006 - Philosophical Studies 129 (2):317-33.
Decision theory and cognitive choice.John R. Welch - 2011 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 1 (2):147-172.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
110 (#156,893)

6 months
1 (#1,533,009)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references