Utilitas 17 (1):46-61 (2005)
Doubts about the origin of Bentham's formula, ‘the greatest happiness of the greatest number’, were resolved by Robert Shackleton thirty years ago. Uncertainty has persisted on at least two points. (1) Why did the phrase largely disappear from Bentham's writing for three or four decades after its appearance in 1776? (2) Is it correct to argue (with David Lyons in 1973) that Bentham's principle is to be differentially interpreted as having sometimes a ‘parochial’ and sometimes a ‘universalist’ bearing? These issues are reopened here with particular reference to textual evidence overlooked in earlier discussions and contextual evidence on the development of Bentham's radicalism in the last two decades of his life. In conclusion some broader issues are raised concerning the character of Bentham's understanding of ‘happiness’ itself.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
The Collected Works of Jeremy Bentham: Deontology. Together with a Table of the Springs of Action and the Article on Utilitarianism.Jeremy Bentham - 1983 - Clarendon Press.
The Collected Works of Jeremy Bentham: Correspondence: Volume 10: July 1820 to December 1821.Jeremy Bentham - 1994 - Clarendon Press.
Individual Sacrifice and the Greatest Happiness: Bentham on Utility and Rights.F. Rosen - 1998 - Utilitas 10 (2):129.
In the Interest of the Governed: A Study in Bentham's Philosophy of Utility and Law.David Lyons - 1991 - Oxford University Press.
Utility and Democracy: The Political Thought of Jeremy Bentham.Philip Schofield - 2006 - Oxford University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads131 ( #33,891 of 2,030,138 )
Recent downloads (6 months)32 ( #10,841 of 2,030,138 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.