Introduction

Isis 98 (2):310-314 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

From Galileo to the Bhopal tort litigation, Scopes to OncoMouse®, Lysenko to the lie detector, the agonistic and alethic forum of the courtroom has offered unique opportunities to witness science and scientists being made and unmade. Evolving legal systems have consistently been forced to draw on (or defensibly away from) scientific knowledge, scientific methods, and scientific experts in the pursuit of truth and justice. At the same time, courts—in many ways the original site for the production of social facts—have to a significant extent shaped both the theories and the practices of knowledge production central to the emergence of modern science. This Focus section draws together a set of scholars at work on these borrowings and aims to stimulate more research in an important and fast‐expanding area of scholarship.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-01-31

Downloads
3 (#1,650,745)

6 months
1 (#1,459,555)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Dan Burnett
Gustavus Adolphus College

Citations of this work

Claiming ownership in the technosciences: Patents, priority and productivity.Christine MacLeod & Gregory Radick - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 44 (2):188-201.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Clues.Carlo Ginzburg - 1979 - Theory and Society 7 (3):273-288.

Add more references