Grazer Philosophische Studien 66 (1):199-249 (2003)
The view that logic is true independently of a subject matter is criticized—enlarging on Quine's criticisms and adding further ones. It is then argued apriori that full reflective understanding of logic and deductive reasoning requires substantial commitment to mathematical entities. It is emphasized that the objectively apriori connections between deductive reasoning and commitment to mathematics need not be accepted by or even comprehensible to a given deductive reasoner. The relevant connections emerged only slowly in the history of logic. But they can be recognized retrospectively as implicit in logic and deductive reasoning. The paper concludes with discussion of the relevance of its main argument to Kant's question—how is apriori knowledge of a subject matter possible?
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Mathematical Intuition and Natural Numbers: A Critical Discussion.Felix Mühlhölzer - 2010 - Erkenntnis 73 (2):265-292.
Some Remarks on Putnam's Contributions to Semantics.Tyler Burge - 2013 - Theoria 79 (3):229-241.
Similar books and articles
Towards a Theory of Mathematical Argument.Ian J. Dove - 2009 - Foundations of Science 14 (1-2):136-152.
Psychologism in the Logic of John Stuart Mill: Mill on the Subject Matter and Foundations of Ratiocinative Logic.David Godden - 2005 - History and Philosophy of Logic 26 (2):115-143.
Field on the Normative Role of Logic.Gilbert Harman - 2009 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 109 (1pt3):333 - 335.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads269 ( #11,827 of 2,158,435 )
Recent downloads (6 months)12 ( #29,874 of 2,158,435 )
How can I increase my downloads?