Cognitive neuroscientists use functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to measure properties of a participant’s brain during a cognitive task. These imaging results are transformed into compelling pictures of brain activity using statistical models. I will argue that, for a broad class of experiments, neuroimaging experts have a tendency to over‐interpret the functional significance of their data. This over‐interpretation appears to follow from contentious theoretical assumptions about the mind‐brain connection, and from a propensity to conflate the anatomical location of a statistically‐significant correlation with knowledge of the mechanistic functioning at that location.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Neural Game Theory and the Search for Rational Agents in the Brain.Gregory S. Berns - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (2):155-156.
Conceptual Challenges in the Neuroimaging of Psychiatric Disorders.Richard A. A. Kanaan & Philip K. McGuire - 2012 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 18 (4):323-332.
(A)E(s)Th(Et)Ics of Brain Imaging. Visibilities and Sayabilities in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging.Hannah Fitsch - 2012 - Neuroethics 5 (3):275-283.
Added to index2009-09-21
Total downloads75 ( #66,445 of 2,143,792 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #227,273 of 2,143,792 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.