Putting structuralism in its place
One textbook may introduce the real numbers in Cantor’s way, and another in Dedekind’s, and the mathematical community as a whole will be completely indifferent to the choice between the two. This sort of phenomenon was famously called to the attention of philosophers by Paul Benacerraf. It will be argued that structuralism in philosophy of mathematics is a mistake, a generalization of Benacerraf’s observation in the wrong direction, resulting from philosophers’ preoccupation with ontology.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Similar books and articles
Foundations for Mathematical Structuralism.Uri Nodelman & Edward N. Zalta - 2014 - Mind 123 (489):39-78.
Structuralism and the Applicability of Mathematics.Jairo José Silvdaa - forthcoming - Axiomathes.
Three Varieties of Mathematical Structuralism.Geoffrey Hellman - 2001 - Philosophia Mathematica 9 (2):184-211.
Structuralism and Conceptual Change in Mathematics.Christopher Menzel - 1990 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:397 - 401.
Puppets and Pebbles and Ripples and Strings: Structuralism and Post-Structuralism Contrasted.Mike Fuller - 1996 - Cogito 10 (1):49-55.
Added to index2009-04-12
Total downloads69 ( #75,051 of 2,158,251 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #355,837 of 2,158,251 )
How can I increase my downloads?