Daniel A. Dombrowski: Rethinking the Ontological Argument: A Neoclassical Theistic Response [Book Review]

Heythrop Journal 50 (4):719-721 (2009)

Authors
Elizabeth Denise Burns
University of London
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords Ontological argument
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1468-2265.2009.00501_21.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 39,692
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Response to Boulting.Daniel Dombrowski - 2005 - Process Studies 34 (1):136-140.
The Replaceability Argument.Daniel Dombrowski - 2001 - Process Studies 30 (1):22-35.
Rival Concepts of God and Rival Versions of Mysticism.Daniel A. Dombrowski - 2010 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 68 (1-3):153-165.
Is the Argument From Marginal Cases Obtuse?Daniel A. Dombrowski - 2006 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 23 (2):223–232.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-09-14

Total views
19 ( #401,074 of 2,327,916 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #222,008 of 2,327,916 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature