Southern Journal of Philosophy 44 (1):1-29 (2006)
William Alston has been a long-time critic of the arguments of Wilfrid Sellars, and he has recently revisited the arguments made by Sellars in “Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind.” Alston’s work attempts to show how Sellarsian views fail to account for our understanding of perception by making a two-part attack on Sellars’s account: part one of the attack takes up the Sellarsian approach to ‘looks’-talk, and part two concerns Sellars’s thoroughgoing conceptualism with regard to perception. In this article, I argue that there is much in Alston’s view that does violence to our understanding of theoretical and practical reason by removing concepts (and thereby constraint by norms) from perception, and I show that Alston’s two-pronged attack fails due to its inadequate reading of “Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind” and its problematic underlying epistemology
|Keywords||Analytic Philosophy Contemporary Philosophy General Interest|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Phenomenal Character and the Myth of the Given.Caleb Liang - 2006 - Journal of Philosophical Research 31:21-36.
Sellars and the "Myth of the Given".William P. Alston - 2002 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 65 (1):69-86.
Sellarsian Perspectives on Perception and Non-Conceptual Content.Susanna Schellenberg - 2006 - In Mark Lance & Michael P. Wolf (eds.), Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities. Rodopi. pp. 173-196.
Still Mythic After All Those Years: On Alston's Latest Defense of the Given.Jay F. Rosenberg - 2006 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 72 (1):157-173.
Perceptual Disanalogy: On the Alstonian Analogy Argument From Religious Experience.William Coleman Williams - unknown
Wilfrid Sellars, Perceptual Consciousness, and Theory of Attention.Paul Coates - 2004 - Essays in Philosophy 5 (1):1-25.
Action, Knowledge, and Reality.Wilfrid Sellars & Hector-Neri Castañeda (eds.) - 1975 - Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
Why Wilfrid Sellars Is Right.William A. Rottschaefer - 2011 - Journal of Philosophical Research 36:291-325.
The Middle Does Not Hold.William A. Rottschaefer - 2011 - Journal of Philosophical Research 36:361-369.
A Myth to Kill a Myth? On McDowell's Interpretation of Sellars' Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind.Paolo Tripodi - 2013 - Theoria 79 (4):353-377.
Perception, Imagination and Demonstrative Reference : A Sellarsian Account.Paul Coates - 2009 - In Willem A. DeVries (ed.), Empiricism, Perceptual Knowledge, Normativity, and Realism: Essays on Wilfrid Sellars. Oxford University Press.
Psychological Nominalism and the Plausibility of Sellars's Myth of Jones.Aaron Allen Schiller - 2007 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 45 (3):435-454.
Science and Sensibility: McDowell and Sellars on Perceptual Experience.Michael Williams - 2006 - European Journal of Philosophy 14 (2):302–325.
Added to index2010-09-14
Total downloads17 ( #287,014 of 2,178,178 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #316,504 of 2,178,178 )
How can I increase my downloads?