Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (1):100-100 (2001)

Abstract
The parallel drawn by Norman between the dorsal and ventral systems and direct and indirect approaches is based on two misrepresentations of the direct approach – that it is concerned only with the unconscious control of action, and that it cannot explain learning. We propose a way of understanding the visual system differences from within the direct approach.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2002
DOI 10.1017/s0140525x02250025
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,323
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Two Visual Systems Must Still Perceive Events.J. Alex Shull & Geoffrey P. Bingham - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (1):118-119.
Integrating Constructivist and Ecological Approaches.Wayne Shebilske - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (1):117-118.
Where Does Perception End and When Does Action Start?Dennis J. McFarland - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (1):113-113.
Egocentric Spatial Representation in Action and Perception.Robert Briscoe - 2009 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 79 (2):423-460.
On the Development of the Two Visual Systems.John van der Kamp & Geert J. P. Savelsbergh - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (1):120-120.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
35 ( #309,073 of 2,448,724 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #445,641 of 2,448,724 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes