Two visual systems but only one theory of perception

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (1):100-100 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The parallel drawn by Norman between the dorsal and ventral systems and direct and indirect approaches is based on two misrepresentations of the direct approach – that it is concerned only with the unconscious control of action, and that it cannot explain learning. We propose a way of understanding the visual system differences from within the direct approach.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,168

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Two visual systems must still perceive events.J. Alex Shull & Geoffrey P. Bingham - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (1):118-119.
Integrating constructivist and ecological approaches.Wayne Shebilske - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (1):117-118.
Where does perception end and when does action start?Dennis J. McFarland - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (1):113-113.
Egocentric Spatial Representation in Action and Perception.Robert Briscoe - 2009 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 79 (2):423-460.
On the development of the two visual systems.John van der Kamp & Geert J. P. Savelsbergh - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (1):120-120.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
35 (#335,639)

6 months
1 (#448,551)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references