Informal Logic 30 (3):235-262 (2010)

Authors
Sylvia Burrow
University of Western Ontario
Abstract
This essay argues that ideals of cooperation or adversariality in argumentation are not equally attainable for women. Women in argumentation contexts face oppressive limitations undermining argument success because their authority is undermined by gendered norms of politeness. Women endorsing or, alternatively, transgressing feminine norms of politeness typically defend their authority in argumentation contexts. And yet, defending authority renders it less legitimate. My argument focuses on women in philosophy but bears the implication that other masculine dis- course contexts present similar double binds that urge social and political change.
Keywords politeness  argumentation  adversality  authority  gendered discourse  adversariality  gender  language  oppression  feminist
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

References found in this work BETA

The Politics of Reality: Essays in Feminist Theory.Marilyn Frye - 1983 - Trumansburg, NY: The Crossing Press.
Coalescent Argumentation.Michael A. Gilbert - 1995 - Argumentation 9 (5):837-852.
Ontology and Social Construction.Sally Haslanger - 1995 - Philosophical Topics 23 (2):95-125.

View all 34 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Bringing Wreck.Tempest Henning - forthcoming - Symposion. Theoretical and Applied Inquiries in Philosophy and Social Sciences.

View all 18 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Politeness, Paris and the Treatise.Mikko Tolonen - 2008 - Hume Studies 34 (1):21-42.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-09-02

Total views
845 ( #8,340 of 2,517,876 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
56 ( #14,450 of 2,517,876 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes