Why Grammar Cannot Be Innate

Southwestern Journal of Philosophy 7 (1):37-44 (1976)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Why grammar cannot be innate.Robert W. Burch - 1976 - Southwestern Journal of Philosophy 7 (1):37-44.
Explanation in Linguistics a Critique of Generative Grammar.Morton Emanuel Winston - 1982 - Reproduced by the Indiana University Linguistics Club.
The innate endowment for language: Underspecified or overspecified?Mark C. Baker - 2005 - In Peter Carruthers, Stephen Laurence & Stephen P. Stich (eds.), The Innate Mind: Structure and Contents. New York, US: Oxford University Press USA. pp. 156--174.
Universal grammar is dead.Michael Tomasello - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (5):470-471.
Innate ideas.Paul M. Pietroski & Stephen Crain - 2005 - In James A. McGilvray (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Chomsky. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 164--181.
Innate Ideas.Stephen P. Stich (ed.) - 1975 - Berkeley, CA, USA: University of California Press.
Associative grammar combination operators for tree-based grammars.Yael Sygal & Shuly Wintner - 2009 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 18 (3):293-316.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-17

Downloads
6 (#1,425,536)

6 months
3 (#1,023,809)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references