Radical Philosophy Today 3:91-99 (2006)
Although gay and lesbian theory may posit homosexuality as an oppositional challenge to heteronormativity, the author argues that homosexuality and heterosexuality share a common structure of desire that is based upon choosing the gender of one’s partner from only one gender in a binary gender framework. For this reason, the author introduces the term ‘monosexual’ to designate any sexual orientation, whether homosexual or heterosexual, which makes a single gender category into an exclusive criterion for selecting partners. As an alternative to these “oppositional” logics, the author argues that bisexuality may be distinguished through its focus on desire regardless of the gender category of one’s partner. This alternative raises questions about logical theories that posit conceptual oppositions as necessary to intelligibility
|Keywords||Conference Proceedings Social and Political Philosophy|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
The Heterosexual Imaginary: Feminist Sociology and Theories of Gender.Chrys Ingraham - 1994 - Sociological Theory 12 (2):203-219.
The Social Construction of Sexual Identity and the Ordination of Practicing Homosexuals.Kathy Rudy - 1997 - Journal of Religious Ethics 25 (1):127-146.
The Limits of Performativity: A Critique of Hegemony in Gender Theory.Dennis Schep - 2012 - Hypatia 27 (4):864-880.
The Selfish Gender, or the Reproduction of Gender Asymmetry in Gender Studies.T. V. Barchunova - 2003 - Studies in East European Thought 55 (1):3-25.
Added to index2011-12-02
Total downloads42 ( #122,783 of 2,164,556 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #50,872 of 2,164,556 )
How can I increase my downloads?