On the Peculiarity of Standards: A Reply to Thompson

Philosophy and Technology 25 (2):243-248 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Abstract   As Paul B. Thompson suggests in his recent seminal paper, “‘There’s an App for That’: Technical Standards and Commodification by Technological Means,” technical standards restructure property (and other social) relations. He concludes with the claim that the development of technical standards of commodification can serve purposes with bad effects such as “the rise of the factory system and the deskilling of work” or progressive effects such as how “technical standards for animal welfare… discipline the unwanted consequences of market forces.” In this reply, we want to append several points to his argument and suggest that he rightly points out that standards can promote various goods; however, there are peculiar powers wielded by standardization processes that might profitably be unpacked more systematically than Thompson's article seems to suggest. First, the concealment of the technopolitics around standards is largely due to their peculiar ontological status as recipes for reality. Second, technical standards can and do commit violence against persons, but such violence is often suffered not in the formation of class consciousness, as Marx might have put it, but as a failure to conform to the laws of nature . Content Type Journal Article Category Commentary Pages 1-6 DOI 10.1007/s13347-011-0048-1 Authors Lawrence Busch, Department of Sociology, Michigan State University, 429A Berkey Hall, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA Kyle Powys Whyte, Department of Philosophy, Michigan State University, 503 S. Kedzie Hall, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA Journal Philosophy & Technology Online ISSN 2210-5441 Print ISSN 2210-5433.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,297

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ideas for How to Take Wicked Problems Seriously.Kyle Powys Whyte & Paul B. Thompson - 2012 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 25 (4):441-445.
What Happens to Environmental Philosophy in a Wicked World?Paul B. Thompson & Kyle Powys Whyte - 2012 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 25 (4):485-498.
Re-Envisioning the Agrarian Ideal.Paul B. Thompson - 2012 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 25 (4):553-562.
Standards, Advice, and Practical Reason.Chrisoula Andreou - 2006 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 3 (1):57-67.
Ii. a reply to Siegel on Kuhnian relativism.Gerald Doppelt - 1980 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 23 (1):117 – 123.
Standards of ethical conduct for management accountants.Charles J. Woelfel - 1986 - Journal of Business Ethics 5 (5):365 - 371.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-10-04

Downloads
25 (#465,601)

6 months
1 (#450,425)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Los estándares como artefactos.Diego Lawler - 2020 - Filosofia Unisinos 21 (1).

Add more citations

References found in this work

Sorting Things out: Classification and Its Consequences.Geoffrey C. Bowker & Susan Leigh Star - 2001 - Journal of the History of Biology 34 (1):212-214.
Inclusion: The Politics of Difference in Medical Research.Steven Epstein - 2008 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 1 (2):174-178.
Hermaphrodites and the Medical Invention of Sex.Alice Domurat Dreger - 2001 - Journal of the History of Biology 34 (1):216-217.

View all 8 references / Add more references