The amoral academy? A critical discussion of research ethics in the neo-liberal university

Educational Philosophy and Theory 53 (5):469-478 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper challenges current dominant thinking in Universities about the processes of ethical appraisal of research studies in the Social Sciences. It considers this to be founded on unjustifiable and inappropriate principles, the origins of which are presented before discussing alternative, more inclusive and ethically defensible approaches. The latter are based on dialogic processes to sustain respectful and empowering ethical reviews which appreciate the situated nature of research. The empirical evidence for this comes from papers about ethnographic studies with children and adults in various educational spaces in Western Europe, originally a symposium on the practice of ethics in educational ethnography at ECER, 2017, now forming a book published by Routledge, 2019. The dialogic processes help researchers to carry out culturally-appropriate research with the demonstrable ethical integrity that participants and stakeholders reasonably expect. The authors argue that currently risk-averse Universities need to change their research cultures to support all research methodologies and fieldwork practices that have ethical integrity and create valuable research that is socially beneficial, to enhance their lustre.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Confessions of an ethics committee chair.Christine Halse - 2011 - Ethics and Education 6 (3):239 - 251.
Ethics and the University.Michael Davis - 1998 - New York: Routledge.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-02-11

Downloads
13 (#1,013,785)

6 months
6 (#512,819)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?