Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (2):219-220 (1999)
We applaud Campbell's cogent arguments for the evolution of female survival mechanisms but take issue with several key conceptual claims: the treatment of patriarchy; the implicit assumption that women are passive pawns in a male game of media exploitation; and the neglect of the possibility that media images exploit existing evolved psychological mechanisms rather than create them.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Why Women Must Guard and Rule in Plato's Kallipolis.Catherine Mckeen - 2006 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 87 (4):527–548.
Theories of Male and Female Aggression.Kirsti M. J. Lagerspetz - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (2):229-230.
Obligations to Animals Are Based on Rights.Tom Regan - 1995 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 8 (2):171-180.
Age Preferences in Mates: An Even Closer Look, Without the Distorting Lenses.Douglas T. Kenrick & Richard C. Keefe - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (1):140-143.
Real Men.Hugh LaFollette - 1992 - In Larry May & Robert Strikwerda (eds.), Masculinity. Rowman & Littlefield. pp. 59--74.
A Feminist Reading of Men's Health: Or, When Paglia Speaks, the Media Listens. [REVIEW]Leslie Rebecca Bloom - 1997 - Journal of Medical Humanities 18 (1):59-73.
Male Dominance Hierarchies and Women's Intrasexual Competition.John Marshall Townsend - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (2):235-236.
Evolution Without Adaptation?Robert Richardson & Lawrence A. Shapiro - 2009 - Metascience 18 (2):319-323.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads43 ( #122,239 of 2,177,962 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #316,663 of 2,177,962 )
How can I increase my downloads?