Foundations of Physics 21 (8):889-904 (1991)

The hypotheses of weak and strong objectification of quantum mechanical observables, as well as theoretical arguments and experimental evidence against these hypotheses, are systematically reviewed
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00733214
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,342
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Quantum Logic.Peter Mittelstaedt - 1974 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1974 (2):501 - 514.
On the Reality of Spin and Helicity.Paul Busch & Franklin E. Schroeck - 1989 - Foundations of Physics 19 (7):807-872.
Quantum Logic.Peter Mittelstaedt - 1980 - Philosophy of Science 47 (2):332-335.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Invariance and Objectivity.Gerhard Vollmer - 2010 - Foundations of Physics 40 (9-10):1651-1667.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Quantum Measurement Problem and Cluster Separability.P. Hájíček - 2011 - Foundations of Physics 41 (4):640-666.
Indeterminacy and Entanglement: The Challenge of Quantum Mechanics.J. Bub - 2000 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51 (4):597-615.
Quantum Mechanics and Realism.Peter Kosso - 2000 - Foundations of Science 5 (1):47-60.
Making Quantum Theory Compatible with Realism.GianCarlo Ghirardi - 2002 - Foundations of Science 7 (1-2):11-47.


Added to PP index

Total views
27 ( #359,600 of 2,326,057 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #438,061 of 2,326,057 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes